Renault Megane 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013

 
Renault Megane
2016 - 2018
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP150 HP
Torque: 156 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds10.2 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Megane engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.8
Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 49 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1240 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.87 m
Height: 1.44 m1.48 m
Renault Megane and Volvo S60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1749 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane has 170 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8372`030
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo S60, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 11 20012 200
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv