Renault Megane 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Renault Megane and Volvo S60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 170 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`852 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo S60, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |