Renault Megane 2016 vs Volvo S60 2015

 
Renault Megane
2016 - 2018
Volvo S60
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 130 HP152 HP
Torque: 205 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds8.6 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Megane engine produces 22 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.8
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 49 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway1390 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 136 mm (5.4 inches)136 mm (5.4 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.87 m
Height: 1.44 m1.48 m
Renault Megane and Volvo S60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1749 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane has 170 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8552`110
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo S60, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 11 20012 600
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv