Renault Megane 2016 vs Renault Megane 2016

 
Renault Megane
2016 - 2018
Renault Megane
2016 - 2018
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 130 HP130 HP
Torque: 205 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds10.8 seconds
Renault Megane 2016 and Renault Megane 2016 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Megane 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Renault Megane 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane 2016 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2016, which means that by driving the Renault Megane 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 49 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway870 km on highway
650 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption
Renault Megane 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 136 mm (5.4 inches)145 mm (5.7 inches)

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years7 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.36 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Renault Megane 2016 is 27 cm longer than the Renault Megane 2016, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres384 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1247 litres
Renault Megane 2016 has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane 2016 has 166 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane 2016.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2016 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Megane 2016.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8551`823
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 11 20014 400
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv