Renault Megane 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015

 
Renault Megane
2016 - 2018
Renault Kadjar
2015 - 2018
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 130 HP130 HP
Torque: 205 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds10.7 seconds
Renault Megane and Renault Kadjar have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar.
Fuel tank capacity: 49 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway1220 km on highway
650 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 136 mm (5.4 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years7 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.45 m
Width: 1.81 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.61 m
Renault Megane is 18 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres472 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1478 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane has 78 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8551`903
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Renault Kadjar has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 20012 600
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Renault Kadjar has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv