Renault Megane 2013 vs Volvo V60 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 68 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1710 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1130 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 94 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. The Volvo V60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`857 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |