Renault Megane 2013 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 23 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Renault Clio. Despite the higher power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Laguna | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 31 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 372 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 84 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |