Renault Megane 2010 vs Hyundai i30 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
1620 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
1030 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane and Hyundai i30 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 378 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | 1316 litres | |
Renault Megane has 27 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 154 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`910 | |
Safety: | |||
The Hyundai i30 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |