Renault Megane 2010 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Fiat Bravo, but torque is 50 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.4 | |
| Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1560 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 4 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
| Renault Megane has 5 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |