Renault Megane 2011 vs Renault Megane 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2011 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane 2011 engine produces 85 HP more power than Renault Megane 2012, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Megane 2012. Thanks to more power Renault Megane 2011 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane 2011 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane 2011 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane 2011 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 344 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | 1024 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2011 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane 2011 has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane 2012. The Renault Megane 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2011 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Megane 2012, which means Renault Megane 2011 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |