Renault Megane 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Renault Megane) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volkswagen Golf) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, but torque is 62 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 610'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 26 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Volkswagen Bora, Seat Leon | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Megane 2000 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
Renault Megane and Volkswagen Golf are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 281 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 448 litres | |
Renault Megane has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | high | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |