Renault Megane 2003 vs BMW X1 2015
| Body: | Cabrio | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 56 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 89 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X1 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW X1 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of BMW X1 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Megane engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 8 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 315 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 1060 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.2 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 995 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
BMW X1 has
| |