Renault Megane 2006 vs Chrysler Sebring 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 186 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 256 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 51 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.50 m | |
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 57 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 193 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | no data | |
Renault Megane has 3 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.93 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 2`175 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |