Renault Megane 2006 vs Audi TT 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 115 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
| Renault Megane is 18 cm longer than the Audi TT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 60 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Audi TT has
| |