Renault Megane 2006 vs Opel Tigra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 60 HP more power than Opel Tigra, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Opel Tigra. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.6 | |
|
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Tigra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 44 cm longer than the Opel Tigra, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
490 litres | 440 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Tigra, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`425 kg | 1`210 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 300 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem more than Opel Tigra. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Opel Tigra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Opel Tigra, so Opel Tigra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Opel Tigra has
| |