Renault Megane 2006 vs Chrysler Sebring 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 10 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.8 | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 57 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | 369 litres | |
| Renault Megane has 3 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 121 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |