Renault Megane 2006 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 35 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 41 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 75 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 540 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |