Renault Megane 2010 vs Renault Megane 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane 2010 engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Megane 2003, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Renault Megane 2003. Thanks to more power Renault Megane 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane 2010 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2003, which means that by driving the Renault Megane 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane 2010 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Grand Scenic | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2010 is larger. Renault Megane 2010 is 13 cm longer than the Renault Megane 2003, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane 2010 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 490 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2010 has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane 2010 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2010 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Megane 2003, which means Renault Megane 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`904 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Megane 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane 2003 has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Renault Megane 2010, so Renault Megane 2010 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |