Renault Megane 2010 vs Renault Megane 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Renault Megane 2010 engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Megane 2003, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Renault Megane 2003. Despite less power, Renault Megane 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane 2010 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane 2010 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 26 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2010 is larger. Renault Megane 2010 is 13 cm longer than the Renault Megane 2003, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane 2010 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 490 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2010 has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane 2010 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2010 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Megane 2003, which means Renault Megane 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`839 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Megane 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane 2003 has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Renault Megane 2010, so Renault Megane 2010 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |