Renault Megane 2010 vs Volvo C70 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 26 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo C70. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 200 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`899 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |