Renault Megane 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2010

 
Renault Megane
2010 - 2012
BMW 3 series
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 130 HP306 HP
Torque: 190 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds5.7 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Megane engine produces 176 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 210 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.38.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway920 km on highway
750 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Grand ScenicInstalled on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.61 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.38 m
Renault Megane is 13 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 211 litres210 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data350 litres
Renault Megane has 1 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8652`180
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 760013 600
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv