Renault Megane 2009 vs Peugeot 307 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 14 HP more power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 307. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2009 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Peugeot 307 2006 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 307 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
| Renault Megane is 14 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2211 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 176 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`894 | 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |