Renault Megane 2009 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 60 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 1130 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
| Renault Megane is 11 cm longer than the Audi TT, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
377 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 52 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`773 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Audi TT has
| |