Renault Megane 2009 vs Citroen C3 2010
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 16 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Citroen C3. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 1130 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Megane 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 35 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
377 litres | 1000 litres | |
| Renault Megane has 44 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 623 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Citroen C3, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`756 | 1`564 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Citroen C3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |