Renault Megane 2012 vs Renault Megane 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2011 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane 2012 engine produces 85 HP less power than Renault Megane 2011, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Megane 2011. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane 2012 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2011, which means that by driving the Renault Megane 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane 2012 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2011. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | 1024 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2011 has more luggage space. Renault Megane 2012 has 33 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2012 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane 2011, which means Renault Megane 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |