Renault Megane 2012 vs Renault Laguna 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Laguna, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
| Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | Used also on Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane is 34 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 79 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | 1`923 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |