Renault Megane 2012 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 148 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.9 | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller, but higher. Renault Megane is 54 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | no data | |
| Renault Megane has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |