Renault Megane 2012 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 40 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1500 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
| Renault Megane is 11 cm longer than the Audi TT, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
991 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 52 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`849 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Audi TT has
| |