Renault Megane 2000 vs Renault Clio 2001
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Renault Megane and Renault Clio have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
1090 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 63 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
| |