Renault Megane 2003 vs Audi A4 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 173 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 11 HP more power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Audi A4. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A4 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Bora | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine Audi A4 1995 1.8 engine: This engine is known for its reliability and durability, often lasting over 450,000 km with proper maintenance. Regular maintenance, particularly using high-quality oil, is essential to maximize its lifespan and performance. One of the most common issues is the failure of the vacuum regulator for the intake ... More about Audi A4 1995 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 2 cm longer than the Audi A4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 440 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 80 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A4, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`775 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A4 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Audi A4 has
| |