Renault Megane 2003 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 30 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2003 2.0 engine Chevrolet Aveo 2004 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality. Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Aveo 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 19 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 375 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 145 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |