Renault Megane 2000 vs Volvo V40 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 107 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Used also on Volvo S40 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V40, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |