Renault Megane 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

 
Renault Megane
2003 - 2006
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2006
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 98 HP75 HP
Torque: 127 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds12.9 seconds
Renault Megane engine produces 23 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.06.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
810 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m3.92 m
Width: 1.78 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower.
Renault Megane is 58 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 13 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1030 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane has 250 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 570 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`790no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10002400
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv