Renault Megane 2006 vs Mazda 6 2008

 
Renault Megane
2006 - 2009
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 340 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds10.6 seconds
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Megane engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway1250 km on highway
980 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel VivaroInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda 5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.71 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher.
Renault Megane is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1751 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 151 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8902`110
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 16003000
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • timing belt engine
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv