Renault Megane 2006 vs Volvo V60 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1670 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km with real consumption | 1210 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Volvo V60 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. The Volvo V60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 355 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 13 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |