Renault Megane 2006 vs Volvo V50 2004

 
Renault Megane
2006 - 2009
Volvo V50
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP136 HP
Torque: 340 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds9.6 seconds
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Megane engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo V50, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway1190 km on highway
980 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.51 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1307 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 103 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 293 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8901`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Volvo V50 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16002200
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv