Renault Megane 2006 vs Mazda 6 2008

 
Renault Megane
2006 - 2009
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 135 HP147 HP
Torque: 191 NM184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds10.3 seconds
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Megane engine produces 12 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 7 NM more than Mazda 6. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway1140 km on highway
720 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 11 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault ClioInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.71 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher.
Renault Megane is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1751 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 151 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`970
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 16003000
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv