Renault Megane 2006 vs Skoda Octavia 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1630 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 60 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 30 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |