Renault Megane 2006 vs Volvo V50 2004

 
Renault Megane
2006 - 2009
Volvo V50
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 110 HP125 HP
Torque: 151 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds11 seconds
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Megane engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.07.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1060 km on highway
800 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V50 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 27 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia DusterInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S40, Volvo C30
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ...  More about Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.51 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1600 litres1307 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 103 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 293 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7951`890
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Volvo V50 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14002000
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv