Renault Megane 2006 vs Hyundai i30 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Hyundai i30, but torque is 84 NM less than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Megane is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 105 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 205 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Hyundai i30 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Hyundai i30 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |