Renault Megane 2012 vs Renault Laguna 2010

Renault Megane
2012 - 2013
Renault Laguna
2010 - 2013
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.


Power: 130 HP110 HP
Torque: 190 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds12.1 seconds
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Laguna, but torque is 50 NM less than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.34.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 240 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1650 km on highway
780 km with real consumption1130 km with real consumption
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank.


Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Grand ScenicInstalled on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect.


Length: 4.56 m4.70 m
Width: 1.80 m1.81 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher.
Renault Megane is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 524 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1595 litresno data
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 74 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. The Renault Laguna may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8371`936
Safety: no data

below average
Renault Laguna has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 50004200
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Renault Laguna has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: