Renault Megane 2000 vs Seat Leon 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 133 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 12 HP more power than Seat Leon, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Seat Leon. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Leon, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1210 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Leon. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Seat Leon has
| |