Renault Megane 2000 vs Renault Clio 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Renault Megane and Renault Clio have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
1090 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 35 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 510 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1210 litres | no data | |
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 162 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |