Renault Megane 2000 vs Audi A3 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 127 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 2 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Renault Modus | Used also on Volkswagen Golf | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Renault Megane is 1 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1210 litres | 1110 litres | |
Renault Megane has 2 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 100 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Audi A3 has
| |