Renault Megane 2004 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 110 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 27 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 13 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1190 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 70 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 174 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`820 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |