Renault Megane 2002 vs Renault Megane 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2018 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane 2002 engine produces 164 HP less power than Renault Megane 2018, whereas torque is 209 NM less than Renault Megane 2018. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane 2002 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2018, which means that by driving the Renault Megane 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane 2002 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2018. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Megane 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Megane 2002 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Megane 2002 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1247 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2002 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Megane 2018. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`899 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |