Renault Megane 2002 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Renault Megane 2002 and Renault Megane 2016 have the same engine power, but Renault Megane 2002 torque is 13 NM less than Renault Megane 2016. Renault Megane 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2002 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane 2002 is 15 cm shorter than the Renault Megane 2016, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane 2002 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1247 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2016 has more luggage space. Renault Megane 2002 has 54 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane 2016 (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2002 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane 2016, which means Renault Megane 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`789 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |