Renault Megane 2002 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2016 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane 2002 engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Megane 2016, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Renault Megane 2016. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane 2002 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane 2002 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane 2002 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2016. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 1110 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane 2016 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane 2002 is 15 cm shorter than the Renault Megane 2016, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane 2002 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1247 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2016 has more luggage space. Renault Megane 2002 has 54 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane 2016 (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2002 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane 2016, which means Renault Megane 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`745 | 1`841 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |