Renault Megane 2002 vs Renault Megane 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2018 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane 2002 engine produces 62 HP less power than Renault Megane 2018, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Renault Megane 2018. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane 2018 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane 2002 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2018, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane 2002 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane 2002 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2018. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Renault Modus | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Megane 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane 2002 is 15 cm shorter than the Renault Megane 2018, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane 2002 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1247 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2018 has more luggage space. Renault Megane 2002 has 77 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane 2018. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane 2018 (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2002 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Megane 2018, which means Renault Megane 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`814 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |