Renault Megane 2006 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 90 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 109 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 76 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 650 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |